When user submit a query to fetch data from SQL server, database engine
do a logical read to check if requested data page is holding the requested data are present in cache if so
it will do logical read and sent back to user, but if the requested data pages
are not present in buffer cache then it will do a physical read which is
reading from disk, this is an expensive operation involving high IO and wait
type.
To avoid physical read, SQL Server has something known as Read Ahead
Read, this will bring the data(data pages in buffer) even before it is
requested from the query. Read Ahead Read operation is a default behavior of
SQL Server.
In this post we will check the performance of Read Ahead Read compared
to physical read with the help of Trace Flag 642.
I have created two set of Query, one using Read Ahead read to fetch the
data and other one using physical read.
With Read Ahead Read: Here I have set the IO on to capture the plan and freed
out the cache and buffer
dbcc traceoff(652,-1)
dbcc freeproccache
dbcc dropcleanbuffers
go
set statistics io on
set statistics time on
--select * from
dbo.person
select * from person.address
set statistics io off
set statistics time off
go
Lets check what IO info is saying
(19614 row(s) affected)
Table 'Address'. Scan count 1, logical
reads 346, physical reads 1, read-ahead reads 344, lob logical reads 0, lob
physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.
(1 row(s) affected)
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 93 ms, elapsed time = 855 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0
ms.
Here we can see Read Ahead Read is 150, that means to fetch 19972
records, database storage engine gets 150 eight K pages to cache before plan
get executed. Now let’s check Without Read Ahead Read
dbcc traceon(652,-1)
dbcc dropcleanbuffers --do not run this on prod
dbcc freeproccache() --do not run this on prod
set statistics io on
set statistics time on
-- select * from dbo.person
select * from person.address
set statistics io off
set statistics time off
go
Let’s check what IO info is saying
(19614 row(s) affected)
Table 'Address'. Scan count 1, logical
reads 345, physical reads 233, read-ahead reads 0, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob
read-ahead reads 0.
(1 row(s) affected)
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 141 ms, elapsed time = 3041 ms.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0
ms.
Here clearly we can see the difference, read ahead read give better
elapsed time compare to Physical Read.
Conclusion: Read Ahead Read perform well as compared to physical
read in our case.
Enjy coding…SQL J
Post Reference: Vikram Aristocratic Elfin Share
No comments:
Post a Comment